Meals and agtech investments don’t stack up with local weather wants

Are meals and agtech buyers deploying their funds properly? That’s the query I requested myself this week when evaluating knowledge from two latest studies. After all, the potential for profitability is a baseline for any good funding. However in a world getting ready to ecological collapse, investments additionally must have which means past cash. So how are buyers doing on that finish? 

Listed here are my two sources: 

  1. AgFunder’s 2022 agrifoodtech investment report analyzed over 3,000 investments, largely from enterprise capital corporations and accelerator funds, backing technology-focused startups throughout the complete meals and agricultural worth chain in 2021. 
  2. The Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change’s (IPCC) latest report synthesized the world’s main science, figuring out actions governments, firms and people can take to scale back and sequester emissions. 

Whereas these two studies aren’t an apples-to-apples comparability, and the matters in every don’t align solely, there’s sufficient overlap to see how latest startup exercise pertains to mitigation wants. 

[Continue the dialogue on how to build a circular economy with forward-thinking leaders at Circularity 22, taking place in Atlanta, GA, May 17-19.]

Let’s begin with the mitigation potential and implied observe modifications. The IPCC recognized seven vital alternatives for internet emissions discount in agriculture, meals and different land use, proven within the chart beneath. I received’t get into the third and fourth bars targeted on ecosystem restoration, afforestation and sustainable forest administration, as they don’t relate on to meals and agriculture. 

Inside the meals methods realm, it recommends the next actions, listed so as of mitigation potential: 

  1. Shield forests and different ecosystems: Scale back deforestation drivers (agriculture, mining, city enlargement) and forest degradation (overharvesting, poor harvesting, overgrazing, pests, wildfires) and set up efficient protected areas.
  2. Sequester carbon in agriculture: Deploy efforts to enhance soil carbon administration in croplands and grasslands, scale agroforestry and using biochar.
  3. Shift to plant-rich diets: Incentivize the adoption of balanced, wholesome and sustainable diets, together with a transition in the direction of extra plant-based consumption and diminished consumption of animal-based meals.
  4. Scale back methane and nitrous oxide emissions: Enhance enteric fermentation, manure administration, nutrient administration and rice cultivation.
  5. Lower meals loss and waste: Approaches to boost harvesting and post-harvesting applied sciences in growing international locations, incentives to scale back waste in developed international locations, reporting and goal setting for big meals companies, use of imperfect merchandise and behavioral modifications.
IPcc Mitigation.

How is the agri-food innovation ecosystem assembly this want? Not very properly — not less than if we take final yr’s investments as a proxy for the place the sector goes. 2021’s greatest checks don’t intently mirror the mitigation alternatives outlined by the IPCC. 

The largest miss: 35.8 % of final yr’s funding went to eGrocery. That’s an $18.5 billion funding distributed throughout 343 offers in on-line shops and marketplaces that promote and ship meals on to customers. Chinese language firm Furong Xingsheng (Chinese language) led this class, and total investments in 2021, with a $3 billion spherical. The grocery store is on the helm of a growing trend in China, the place customers band collectively in teams to buy recent produce and different gadgets in bulk, securing higher offers. 

This new mannequin may tie into some mitigation alternatives. Extra direct bulk purchases from wholesalers and farmers may scale back waste and cheaper produce may result in extra vegetable consumption. However the market doesn’t actively incentivize these outcomes and doesn’t appear to have a giant sustainability focus normally. 

Many different on-line grocery startups that raised massive rounds work on instantaneous supply. This consists of goPuff, Gorillas and Flink. Ordering groceries on the fly would possibly result in some meals waste reductions, however that’s not the first aim of those startups, and I haven’t seen proof of that occuring. Quite the opposite, smaller and extra frequent grocery-related deliveries would possibly enhance transportation-based meals emissions. In my view, instantaneous grocery is a luxurious good the world doesn’t want. The cash and brainpower going into these platforms could be higher spent fixing actual local weather issues. 

The closest match: Revolutionary meals (outlined as cultured meat, novel components and plant-based proteins) shared the second spot with cloud retail infrastructure (outlined as on-demand enabling tech, ghost kitchens, last-mile supply robots and companies). They every pocketed $4.8 billion, accounting for 9.3 % of the yr’s whole. Various proteins straight match the third greatest alternative of the IPCC report, supporting food regimen shifts from meat to vegetation. Impossible Foods, Nature’s Fynd and Perfect Day led this class final yr. 

I’m shocked on the carbon entrance, as carbon market startups equivalent to Indigo and Nori have seen overwhelming demand.

Various protein startups additionally not directly contribute to the IPCC’s major alternative — decreasing deforestation and different land-use change — as their merchandise have a considerably smaller land footprint than animal-based counterparts. 

The center floor: There’s some first rate exercise in midstream tech and agricultural biotechnology, which made up 7.3 % and 5.1 % of final yr’s investments, respectively. 

Apeel Sciences emerged because the chief in midstream tech with a $250 million increase and its climate-relevant give attention to stopping meals waste. The Web of Issues (IoT) startup Williot got here in second with a $200 million increase. By bettering provide chain monitoring and transparency with a cloud-based monitoring system, the startup additionally hopes to make a dent in meals waste and different provide chain efficiencies.

Firms engaged on gene enhancing and microbial fertilizer, which translated to the 2 greatest raises on this class, dominated Ag biotech final yr. At $430 million, Pivot Bio scored the largest deal. The startup is growing microbial expertise to switch artificial nitrogen, a big emission supply in agriculture. Inari makes use of predictive design and gene enhancing applied sciences to create higher-yielding seeds and raised $208 million. This might assist scale back land-conversion pressures by producing extra meals on much less land, thus tying into the IPCC’s precedence areas. 

What holes does this depart us with? Meals and agtech investments appear to be lacking the mark on deforestation, carbon sequestration options and methane discount approaches in comparison with their mitigation potential. I’m particularly shocked on the carbon entrance, as carbon market startups equivalent to Indigo and Nori have seen overwhelming demand. 

AgFunder’s methodology for this report would possibly clarify a portion of this hole, which focuses on investments in options that “are notably excessive tech or make the most of proprietary expertise” slightly than itemizing extra conventional farming updates. Equally, the report may not seize deforestation-related investments in the event that they’re circuitously tied to agricultural provide chains, explaining some missed alternatives right here. (I didn’t hear again from AgFunder in time for this piece to make clear these questions). Both approach, we have now a protracted solution to go.  


Leave a Reply