EPA reverses finding in revised draft risk evaluation for TSCA chemical, seeks comment

Washington — The Environmental Safety Company is looking for public touch upon a revised draft danger analysis that states Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster poses unreasonable danger underneath sure situations – a reversal of earlier findings that the chemical substance presents no unreasonable danger of damage to people or the surroundings, based on a discover published within the Dec. 29 Federal Register.

Among the many first 10 chemical substances underneath analysis for potential well being and environmental dangers underneath the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, the substance, also called HBCD, features a sub-cluster that’s used as a flame retardant in extruded polystyrene foam, textiles, and electrical and digital home equipment.

In accordance with the revised draft, a number of occupational use eventualities current unreasonable danger, together with:

  • Importing
  • Processing by incorporation right into a formulation, combination or response merchandise
  • Processing by incorporation into articles
  • Recycling of extruded/expanded polystyrene foam, resin and panels containing HBCD
  • Industrial or client use of HBCD in development or constructing supplies
  • Disposal in development and demolition waste

Launched as a draft in July 2019 and finalized in September 2020, EPA’s preliminary analysis of HBCD discovered that the chemical presents no unreasonable danger to the final inhabitants, employees or the surroundings.

Within the discover, the company says the draft revision “supersedes the situation of use-specific no unreasonable danger determinations within the September 2020 HBCD danger analysis (and withdraw the related order) and makes a revised willpower of unreasonable danger for HBCD as an entire chemical substance.”

The revision corresponds with the company’s summer season retooling of the chemical danger analysis course of. In response to numerous Government Orders and directives from the Biden administration, EPA in June introduced plans to change certain aspects of the process underneath the Lautenberg Act with the target of making certain “the general public is protected against unreasonable dangers from chemical substances in a means that’s supported by science and the regulation.”

Deliberate actions to that finish embrace utilizing a “entire substance” strategy when figuring out unreasonable danger – moderately than basing determinations on separate situations of use – in addition to revisiting the belief that non-public protecting tools is all the time supplied and worn correctly by employees when making danger determinations.

The deadline to comment on the revised draft is Feb. 14.


Leave a Reply