COP27 is a dystopian nightmare

Central to the fossil gasoline trade’s PR offensive is the brand new sprint for gasoline, kick-started by the Russian struggle on Ukraine and Moscow’s decision to restrict gasoline provides to Europe.

For the Gasoline Exporting Nations Discussion board, an alliance of 17 massive gasoline producers together with Egypt, COP27 was “an excellent opportunity to make a case for gasoline within the vitality transition.”


Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February, plans to construct 26 new import terminals for liquefied pure gasoline (LNG) have been introduced in Europe; the EU has signed a deal with Egypt and Israel to help gasoline extraction within the East Mediterranean Sea and European politicians have sought gasoline challenge offers with African nations.

As soon as a gasoline challenge is set on, it could possibly take as much as 10 years earlier than manufacturing begins. So Europe’s provide hole this yr and subsequent shall be filled, if in any respect, by present producers corresponding to Qatar, the U.S. and Australia, not by new tasks.

The hazard is that, over the following decade, these tasks will push the world nonetheless farther from the purpose of limiting international heating to 1.5 levels Celsius (1.5°C) above pre-industrial ranges.

This yr’s United Nations local weather summit is the primary to which oil and gasoline corporations have been invited to take part within the official program of occasions.

The Worldwide Vitality Company says that, to hit “internet zero” targets, there will be no new gasoline or oil fields, and that gasoline demand should be slashed; UN Secretary-Normal António Guterres said in June that investing in oil or gasoline manufacturing was “delusional.”


Though pure gasoline produces solely about half the carbon emissions per unit of vitality that coal does, local weather science says it should be phased out.

Furthermore, leakages of methane (i.e. gasoline) have been acknowledged as a major local weather threat: Methane’s greenhouse impact, over a 20-year timespan, is 86 occasions as highly effective as carbon dioxide’s.

And but in Could, the European Fee classified pure gasoline as a “sustainable” supply of vitality below its funding taxonomy guidelines, and in September the U.Ok. authorities offered new licences for North Sea oil and gasoline fields.

It was these greenwashing, rich nation governments that, with oil corporations, turned COP27 right into a local weather catastrophe.

At Sharm el-Sheikh, African governments introduced gasoline tasks on the continent as a way of financial growth — however they “won’t ship for African communities,” warned Don’t Gasoline Africa, an alliance of civil society teams that advocate large-scale renewables versus export-focused fossil gasoline manufacturing.


Nigerian local weather justice campaigner Nnimmo Bassey, coordinator of Oilwatch Worldwide, denounced the African governments’ pro-gas stance as “ecocide and intergenerational crime” that “perpetuates colonialism and ecological irresponsibility.”

The fossil gasoline PR circus at Sharm el-Sheikh has obscured the frightful disaster on the coronary heart of the talks: that the door is closing on the potential for retaining international heating to 1.5°C, as Local weather Motion Tracker researchers confirmed in an authoritative report on local weather inaction.

Nations’ present insurance policies will produce international heating of between 2.2°C and three.4°C by the tip of the century, the report confirmed.

Commitments made eventually yr’s Glasgow talks to toughen up nationwide targets (Nationally Decided Contributions, or NDCs) have been damaged; commitments made to exit from coal have been disrupted; and wealthy international locations have once more damaged guarantees to finance the vitality transition within the World South.

In Sharm el-Sheikh, talks about implementing already-inadequate selections went at snail’s tempo.


Delegates from exterior the wealthy world fumed at gradual progress on Loss and Damage, the precept that wealthy international locations ought to pay for the billions of {dollars} in harm already completed by local weather change — for instance, by the floods in Pakistan this summer time.

Campaigners urged a windfall tax on fossil gasoline corporations for this function.

The fossil gasoline corporations’ brazen grandstanding, and governments’ acquiescence, has examined the religion of marketing campaign teams, local weather scientists, and others within the prospect of top-down options to the local weather disaster.

Wealth and energy have been flaunted. Coca-Cola, the world’s high plastic polluter, sponsored the talks. Delegates flew in on personal jets.

Swedish activist Greta Thunberg stayed away from Sharm el-Sheikh, describing the negotiations as “a chance for leaders and other people in energy to get consideration, utilizing many various sorts of greenwashing.”


Reasonably than the COP’s incremental steps, “system-wide transformation” is required, she stated at a London e book launch, infuriating right-wing commentators and techno-utopians.

However Thunberg was reflecting deeply felt anger amongst marketing campaign teams, together with those that have for years invested hope within the COP course of.

Greater than 450 organizations supported a call for a UN Accountability Framework to “finish company seize”; throw “massive polluters” out of the local weather talks; require delegates publicly to reveal their pursuits; ban partnership or sponsorship of talks by the polluters; and ease restrictions on civil society entry.

Because the local weather talks have lurched in direction of greenwashing, protests and direct actions over governments’ failures are gaining momentum once more after being disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pascoe Sabido, researcher at Company Europe Observatory, stated: “There’s a motion on the streets [about climate change], however it has not been translated into political energy.


‘The issue is the ability of governments, and their alliance with fossil gasoline corporations. Till we break open that relationship, there won’t be a transition away from fossil fuels.”

So are the local weather talks a part of the issue, or a part of the answer?

It’s not solely activists who’re asking. The authors of the UN Setting Programme’s newest “Emissions Gap Report” described their findings as “testimony to insufficient motion on the worldwide local weather disaster, and is a name for the speedy transformation of societies.”

There had been “little or no progress” because the 2021 Glasgow talks, and governments’ present insurance policies are on observe to trigger 2.8°C rise in temperature by 2100, the report says. “A number of main transformations should be initiated on this decade, concurrently throughout all [fossil fuel-based technological] programs.”


Thirty-plus years of historical past issues. Previous to the talks in Egypt, local weather scientists shared on social media a graph exhibiting the relentless rise within the ambiance’s carbon dioxide content material, from about 360 components per million (ppm) when the Rio local weather treaty was signed in 1992, to 420 ppm now. The inexorable rise in fossil gasoline use is the principle trigger.

The alliance of the world’s strongest states, who negotiated the local weather agreements, just isn’t solely unwilling, but in addition unable, to do what is required.

To stop harmful international heating, programs should change — not solely technological programs, however financial and social ones.

And people governments’ perform is to defend and handle these programs, not rework them. Society as an entire must take care of local weather change, in defiance of these governments.

This Writer

Simon Pirani is honorary professor on the College of Durham within the UK, and creator of Burning Up: A World Historical past of Fossil Gas Consumption (Pluto, 2018). Pirani wrote many papers and e book chapters on vitality economics and the fracked gasoline sector in Russia, Ukraine and the Caspian area as a senior analysis fellow on the Oxford Institute for Vitality Research (2007-21). He writes a weblog at Observe him on Twitter: @SimonPirani1This text first appeared at Truth Out!


Leave a Reply